BERLIN
CH KILGER Anwaltspartnerschaft mbB
Fasanenstraße 29
10719 Berlin, Germany
t +49 30 886 20 07 – 0
f +49 30 886 20 07 – 10
berlin@chkilger.com
PORTO CERVO ITALY
CH KILGER SRL
Via della Gomena 4
07021 PORTO CERVO
Sardegna
marazzi@chkilger.com
BUENOS AIRES
CH KILGER Anwaltspartnerschaft mbB
c/o Estudio Domma
Uruguay 390 piso 15 of., “c”
Capital Federal
Buenos Aires, Argentina
marazzi@chkilger.com
MEXICO CITY
CH KILGER Anwaltspartnerschaft mbB
c/o WJS
Col. Centro
Cuernavaca, Morelos
C.P. 62001
MEXICO
marazzi@chkilger.com





7/2026
CH KILGER CITED IN LAW360
After winning in the first instance Munich LG I Patent Vindication Law Suit LAW360 picks up on the story and mentions CH KILGER as the law firm representing the winning Defendant. At the time the decision was still appealable.
Read more
6/2026
CH KILGER WINS IN DERIVATION LAWSUIT
BEFORE THE MUNICH DISTRICT COURT I
PROTEIN SEQUENCING LAWSUIT 44 O 10621/22 OVER
EP 3270139 B1 IS DISMISSED
The ability to sequence proteins has huge scientific and even more so diagnostic potential – it is a billion EURO market. While sequencing DNA has now become common place, the sequencing of proteins is still in its infancy.
Read more
1/2026
PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS IN BIOTECH & PHARMA
Intellectual Property for Researchers, Inventors and Founders
When? Friday, 6 February 2026 Read more
1/2026
From Ancient DNA to Global Courtrooms:
The Unlikely Journey of Dr. Christian Kilger
Read more ›
6/2025
CH KILGER at BIO USA in BOSTON
CH KILGER will be at BIO USA in BOSTON.
See us at booth #2865 and contact us for beers.
Read more
2/2025
CH KILGER wins EPO APPEAL
EPO REVOKES SINGLE CELL BARCODING PATENT EP 2 625 320 B1
Representing an undisclosed client, CH KILGER attacked the EUROPEAN PATENT EP 2 625 320 B1 in an Opposition before the European Patent Office in December of 2019.
Read more
3/2024
CH KILGER wins twice in EPO Board of Appeal Proceedings
EPO revokes two more DNA-sequencing patents despite Illumina appeal.
The EPO Boards of Appeal have confirmed the revocation of two more Illumina patents concerning DNA-sequencing technology. The same boards also issued a negative preliminary opinion concerning a third patent held by the US manufacturer of genetic engineering equipment.
Read more